Viewing 20 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #868

      Arthur
      Spectator

      http://cgi.ebay.nl/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie … 0141006492

      Far from mint condition, if you ask me… :roll:

    • #29463

      amnesia
      Spectator

      yeah, but its still goin to sell for a high price.200, 300 bucks, maybe ?

    • #29464

      Not necessarily. I’ve seen some of these go for $150-175. (And they looked better than this set.)

    • #29465

      blueczarina
      Spectator

      those would be cooler if they were less grubby :roll: i like to keep all of my CDs to be clean.

    • #29466

      when i’m sad, i like to lick my rarest cds. so yeah, fingerprints are gross!

      just kidding.

      haha, this reminds me, once i was at a second hand record store and one of the customers suddenly started licking a record he just took out of the sleeve.
      the lady of the store said: \"hey, stop that! you’ve been doing this before and other customers have been complaining about it. it’s gross. and why would you lick it in the first place?!? and you’ve never bought anything here. you just come in to lick records and scare away people.\"
      and he said: \"i know what you’re doing! you’re treating the records with product, so they look shinier than they really are. i can taste it!\"
      and the lady said: \"hell no, why would we do that? get the fuck out!\"
      and then he went out of the store. true story.

    • #29467

      blueczarina
      Spectator

      WTF? :lol:

    • #29468

      my thoughts exactly.

    • #29469

      blueczarina
      Spectator

      that is pretty retarded. people can be so weird.

    • #29470

      i had forgotten about this lovely story until today. i just ignored it at the time, because it was so awkward.

    • #29471

      blueczarina
      Spectator

      it is pretty awkward, especially seeing it. i wouldn’t know what to say.

    • #29472

      manillascissor
      Keymaster

      when i’m sad, i like to lick my rarest cds. so yeah, fingerprints are gross!

      just kidding.

      haha, this reminds me, once i was at a second hand record store and one of the customers suddenly started licking a record he just took out of the sleeve.
      the lady of the store said: "hey, stop that! you’ve been doing this before and other customers have been complaining about it. it’s gross. and why would you lick it in the first place?!? and you’ve never bought anything here. you just come in to lick records and scare away people."
      and he said: "i know what you’re doing! you’re treating the records with product, so they look shinier than they really are. i can taste it!"
      and the lady said: "hell no, why would we do that? get the fuck out!"
      and then he went out of the store. true story.[/quote:z8gm1oae]

      best post in awhile. :D

    • #29473

      Pipoka
      Spectator

      that story is really unbelivable! :lol:

    • #29474

      Anonymous
      Spectator

      wow, that’s quite the story. How awkward, did you laugh a little at the time?

    • #29475

      Thom
      Spectator

      That was me. And they WERE using a product to make the records shinier!!!

    • #29476

      blueczarina
      Spectator

      were they at least tasty Thom?

    • #29477

      wow, that’s quite the story. How awkward, did you laugh a little at the time?[/quote:1aey12ex]
      Yes, I giggled quietly.

    • #29478

      tiny
      Spectator

      Those smudges I believe are ink smudges, not caused by water or anything else. I believe they were caused during printing or soon after before the ink had dried.

      I say this as a few of my UK CDR acetate pumpkins promo’s have a similar markings and the ink appears to have been smudged either by the print head or placing the copies on top of each other before they had dried.

    • #29479

      Thom
      Spectator

      I also have a few like that, smudged ink too. That said you can see some ring wear and other stuff going on here too.

    • #29480

      Do you think it’s ink? I thought it was toner. (From a laser printer, instead of a inkjet printer.)

      I think it’s normal that toner starts sticking to the plastic after a while. (In this case it has nothing to do with putting the inserts in the plastic sleeves while the ink is still wet. It just happens after a while.)

    • #29481

      Tion
      Spectator

      i still need this for my collection, but the pics look so grubby :?

    • #29482

      Arthur
      Spectator

      I also have a few like that, smudged ink too. That said you can see some ring wear and other stuff going on here too.[/quote:29cmwkaq]
      One can see clearly on the top right cd that the ink/toner marks have been caused by inserting the inner paper in at least 2 ways. The Virgin logo is copied onto the plastic sleeve on the top right while the ink/toner was not dry yet. For the rest it’s mainly some wrinkles in the paper, so the whole set looks OK to me. Not by any means "mint" but just OK. Still worthwhile buying I guess.

      And the seller is rather honest about it too, as you probably noticed.

      "The 3 eps have a few light marks,excellent to excellent+ condition.The album has some marks,plays fine,excellent- to excellent condition.The sleeves have a few grubby fingerprints but excellent+ condition"

Viewing 20 reply threads

The forum ‘Collecting Items’ is closed to new topics and replies.