Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
PipokaSpectator
Don’t touch Set the Ray to Jerry!
I kill you![/quote:1m54teyr]thats pretty freaky! i dont know what songs to take from at this point.[/quote:1m54teyr]
it’s just a warning

PipokaSpectator
another contibution to the silliness of this forum !
yeah i understand you, this is getting harder and harder !
PipokaSpectatorwow
9 of us are here- don’t see that everyday.
[/quote:3f8zfrws]yes that’s cool!

PipokaSpectatorditto ^^ for Cherry
[/quote:3evbv9tc]i’m glad that you have been adding points for cherry because i love it too

PipokaSpectatorThat is one of the flaws – that the God Pascal says to believe in doesn’t know you are believing just to gain any potential benefits, and that belief is the only requirement to be rewarded with heaven. And I believe that if the Christian god exists as is commonly depicted (Benevolent, omniscient etc.) he wouldn’t punish based on whether they believed or not. [/quote:v5lry6k6]
I couldn’t agree more. The God I believe in wouldn’t base himself in belief, but in what really matters; a person’s intentions. I refuse to believe in such a punishing god.
But allow me to try to understand this philosophy a little better. Believing in a God that exists would bring infinite gain. Not believing in a God that exists would bring infinite loss. Believing in a God that doesn’t exist would bring a finite loss.
I mostly do not agree with the third. I wouldn’t consider not being rewarded as a finite loss. And if God doesn’t exist, who would reward, anyways? There would be no loss in this statement, in my humble opinion.[/quote:v5lry6k6]
yes, that’s my thoughts about his philosophy too…
PipokaSpectator
Don’t touch Set the Ray to Jerry!
I kill you!
PipokaSpectatorHum… interesting…
I was looking for it on wikipedia.
Well, Blame Pascal lived on 17th century … we have to think about that when trying to understand his point of view.And I believe that if the Christian god exists as is commonly depicted (Benevolent, omniscient etc.) he wouldn’t punsih based on whether they believed or not. [/quote:2zu0a89t]
I agree with you on this…
PipokaSpectatorI don’t understand what’s the point to think about this because it’s so personal that there are no rules, or at least we can’t assume only this 4 statements.
I believe and i don’t think that i will be rewarded for that, just like those who don’t believe, won’t be punished for that…That is based in a particular religion, or is just a general thought about faith?[/quote:kzbqxe2m]
Pascal’s Wager is basically the "believe in a god, lose nothing or gain everything" argument. The 4 steps are the logical steps involved in Pascal’s Wager. It is an argument frequently used as to why having faith is better than atheism. My post is a criticism of it, essentially. My post is just a criticism of a philosophical argument, that’s all.
The person who created it was a Christian, so the argument is biased towards the idea of a Christian God. To be honest, I’m not entirely sure what you’re saying in your comment though…[/quote:kzbqxe2m]
I guess i did not understand you too.
I said that i believe in god. but i don’t think i will be rewarded for that. Just like those who don’t believe in God won’t be punished for that too.
1 If you believe in God and God does exist, you will be rewarded with eternal life in heaven; thus an infinite gain.
2 If you do not believe in God and God does exist, you will be condemned to remain in hell forever; thus an infinite loss.
3 If you believe in God and God does not exist, you will not be rewarded; thus a finite loss.
4 If you do not believe in God and God does not exist, you will not be rewarded, but you have lived your own life; thus a finite gain [/quote:kzbqxe2m]These thoughts are yours, or are you citing PW ?
PipokaSpectatorI don’t understand what’s the point to think about this because it’s so personal that there are no rules, or at least we can’t assume only this 4 statements.
I believe and i don’t think that i will be rewarded for that, just like those who don’t believe, won’t be punished for that…That is based in a particular religion, or is just a general thought about faith?
PipokaSpectatorUgly [17]
Cherry [14]
Set the Ray to Jerry [12] +
God [15]
Mouths of Babes [12]-
PipokaSpectatorUgly [16]
Cherry [14]+
Believe [0] –
Set the Ray to Jerry [12] +
God [14]-
Mouths of Babes [14]
PipokaSpectatorthe cold is back again… i can’t do anything with my hands frozen !
my sister went to the north of the country and she’s so happy that is snowing there… i’m happy that i’m not there
my mobile phone rang… another pic of her (and the snow…)

PipokaSpectatorhorrible….

PipokaSpectatorDreaming [1] –
Ugly [13]
Cherry [11]
Believe [7]
Set the Ray to Jerry [11] +
God [14]
Mouths of Babes [13]
PipokaSpectatorhehe that was prob a stupid question huh
i like pretty men too, i don’t like macho men. i think it is sexy if a man is not afraid to show his feminine side.[/quote:388o6h3i]
well there are only one sexy man in that picture (for my taste of course!)

PipokaSpectatorYoure All Ive Got Tonight [2]
Dreaming [3] –
Ugly [12]
Cherry [10]
Believe [6]
Set the Ray to Jerry [11] +
God [13]
Mouths of Babes [13]
PipokaSpectatorSome masculinity is also hot- I don’t want a delicate lady, y’know. And some stubble is always accepted. Like that of Hugh Laurie from House. I’m so attracted to him, even though he could easily be my father. Quite easily actually. But hey I don’t like kids
. Damn I’m so glad no one I know comes here ._.[/quote:i85pv7t8]yes… that mature look is very appealing to me too
PipokaSpectatori don’t care for that, but i don’t like scruffy or burly or super macho masculine.
[/quote:1sqr7nhr]oh no! but i didn’t mean that either!

PipokaSpectatori like dirty boys sometimes, like james franco in pineapple express, i just watched that movie last night, he is hot in a dirty/stoned/silly way.[/quote:30nenom1]
me too… i feel more atracted to masculine features than a beauty clean face boy
PipokaSpectatortion forgot to paste over your all ive got tonight and pipoka earlier today put a minus for dreaming, but didnt take the point away. but i think its all fixed now, with my vote reflected.[/quote:39qgs2ak]
i have to quit voting in the morning, right after waking up … sorry guys and thanks some pumpkins

PipokaSpectatorYoure All Ive Got Tonight [4]
Dreaming [5] –
Ugly [11]
Cherry [9]
Believe [6]
Set the Ray to Jerry [11] +
God [13]
Mouths of Babes [12]
PipokaSpectatorFeist, a canadian singer. i really like her
PipokaSpectatorthat sucks… but don’t be afraid, or try not to
hopefully you will get the help you need.i used to have sleeping disorders too when i was a child but i’m fine now
PipokaSpectatori just re-read my coment and … it makes no sense!
oh boy… my head is getting worse !
i was wondering what did you put around the eyes… they look like bubblebath crystals…
PipokaSpectatorgreat find
and you should post the other song Mayo
[/quote:1v5b38yw]I think i have it too… i will look for it
-
AuthorPosts