MonteLDS

[MonteLDS]

ah i see. i guess it just really isn’t as obvious as SPFC has it where links are a certain color

[MonteLDS]

i have mostly used the site to look up the different releases and have found that the site could be improved is linking materials within the site.

for example, if i search the Lull EP and it mentions that Bye June is taken from the moon demo tape, the words \"moon demo tape\" should be a link to the page that shows me the tape.

[MonteLDS]

i don’t know what you want us (SPfreaks) to do? we have this forum, we’ve discussed the entry, and i’ve stated it will be entered into the database. should we dwell on it? what’s left to say? the rest, right now, is pure speculation, we have to wait for the facts to come out…[/quote:3q3g4tdi]

that’s why you need to get this out in the open.
either per Twitter or me mailing the guys at the pressing / mastering plant and Monte and the management.
and the media.

it’s not about dwelling on a topic.
it’s about trying to find out what happened, when, where and why or how?!

the facts won’t come out of thin air if there’s no mention of this to the band or anything.
now, it’s about getting the history straight and put together.
the factual matter is correct; these are the matrix codes in our copies. these are the messages.
next stage: please explain…[/quote:3q3g4tdi]

it is out in the open. monte had notified the band before you had emailed them. that’s how we know billy is offended and more than likely hurt by this. this is his (imo) iconic album as a band, and it’s pissed on by some fuck either at the pressing plant or by whoever was in charge of the reissues to begin with. or, this could be some sort of a joke and billy is in on it. point being, our frontpage article would say:

[/quote:3q3g4tdi]

just to set the record straight I never notified the band.

[Author]

Posts