Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 3,051 through 3,075 (of 3,088 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Value question German M2 promo acetate #2876

    Billy creates the vinyl, and burns this CD (or a few), most probably from the same studio master.[/quote:aexwn01f]
    i think he let someone else create the cd (he can’t do this himself), sourced from a vinyl.

    all machina II’s out there are vinyl sourced.

    in reply to: 4:20 Shirt #3141

    Still I don’t know anything about the Four-Twenty shirt… :?[/quote:sl5x6908]
    check out this thread, it has a picture: http://forums.netphoria.org/showthread.php?t=148931

    in reply to: Value question German M2 promo acetate #2874

    Wouldn’t they call any cd they use to make a couple of promo copies a \"master cd\", no matter what the quality is?

    in reply to: Value question German M2 promo acetate #2871

    and a question in response to your original question: do you know if the audio on that german promo is identical to one of the well-spread sources (spifc, q101, virgin)? or if not, is it inferior to those?

    i don’t remember where i heard this, but somewhere in my memory it says this source isn’t really that good. i might be wrong.
    anyway, this could have an influence on what people might want to pay for it. i mean, sure, it is rare as hell, but if it turns out to be sourced from mp3s from a source that runs a bit too fast, for example, then it loses a lot of its magic, in my opinion.

    in reply to: Value question German M2 promo acetate #2870

    I wasn’t referring to the possible existence of Masterdisk M2 cdrs, because I don’t think there will be any[/quote:lyoyn8qf]i was thinking the same thing. it wouldn’t make much sense.

    in reply to: Value question German M2 promo acetate #2868

    the Masterdisks I referred to are like the Untitled and MCIS ones on this site.[/quote:37l7magr]
    are you sure they exist for machina II?

    in reply to: Billy’s married? True or not true? #3058

    i’m the netphorian factor on this forum. the rest of the people are nicer.

    in reply to: Billy’s married? True or not true? #3056

    as far as i’m concerned, you and the crazy marriage woman are the same person.

    Reaction SPfreaks: this is not the general attitude here, and we don’t allow this attitude here either. It stays as an example of how we don’t want people to treat other forummembers. Scolding, flaming, cursing, personal attacks to other forum members are not allowed, period. Do not mix the subject of the message with the object that brings the message.

    in reply to: Looking for I am one vinyl, good price #1950

    Anything else on your site? I click the pic and nothing happens…[/quote:1ehupwiy]
    haha, no, that’s basically all there is. :D

    unless you like prayman: [url:1ehupwiy]http://users.telenet.be/crush/prayman/[/url:1ehupwiy]
    i made those back in the day when billy had his light-blue website and was posting blogs about mother mary and praying.

    in reply to: Looking for I am one vinyl, good price #1948

    yeah, i think we have a bit of a misunderstanding here. i just made a screenshot of the ava adore video where he does the lip thing and then i clipped and resized it. that is all i did. i didn’t really do anything creative with it.

    if you want another evil billy, check out my website: [url:2lf2u0ai]http://users.telenet.be/crush[/url:2lf2u0ai]

    in reply to: Looking for I am one vinyl, good price #1946

    you mean you look for them online?

    in reply to: Billy’s married? True or not true? #3052

    have been researching the "veronica grey" thing for several weeks.[/quote:2vn0sl5o]
    why on earth would anyone do that? :roll:

    i think simply ignoring the whole thing is the easiest and the best solution.

    in reply to: Looking for I am one vinyl, good price #1944

    i made it myself, 4 years ago. it’s one of the only avatars that meets the avatar restrictions of this forum.

    in reply to: Pumpkins collection for sale…. #2851

    MACHINA – ALBUM COVER ARTWORK PROOF!!

    NME SINGLES OF THE WEEK – CD
    NOODLES IN FRENZY – CD

    RIFFS TOTAL GUITAR – CD[/quote:4f5uyfkc]
    how much for any of these?
    and does the riffs total guitar cd contain the actual pumpkins songs?

    in reply to: Looking for I am one vinyl, good price #1941

    I havent heard anything back yet, except for the 125-150 dollar one on Ebay. Sorry!! I was told he is on the lookout still![/quote:119y4sdv]that’s a good price, actually.

    in reply to: Smashing Pumpkins Collectibles #2787

    Yeah, not a big Bowie fan. I can imagine though, how much time and effort that would take, my god. Are you a fan?[/quote:14dzk64f]
    i’m a fan. not a collector though. phew.

    in reply to: Billy talked to his lawyer… #2809

    i think they are just pumpkins t-shirts that mention \"420\", in reference to the many pot smokers in asheville.
    ([url:36y8vxc4]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_%28cannabis_culture%29[/url:36y8vxc4])

    in reply to: Smashing Pumpkins Collectibles #2785

    Is there any other band with comparable collections? I mean, I’ve been collecting for 12 years, and I’m nowhere near complete. What the hell? It’s seemingly impossible to collect every release from every country on every format.[/quote:3i3j2dee]
    i think basically every band that has been around for over 10 years has a comparable collection.

    how about you try getting everything from david bowie? we’ll talk again in 12 years and see how much you got.

    in reply to: Discovered (more releases to collect) #2713

    i also have a japanese lull promo, but the previous owner removed the sticker and scratched off the \"promo sample\" text. :(

    it’s worthless now.

    in reply to: Stellar? What’s it like? #2765

    Go here Aurthur ,they have for download* Stellar*
    http://www.myspace.com/thesmashingpumpkinsmusic[/quote:1i2eo8wj]
    wow, i wonder how long it’ll take before they shut that account down.

    i’m not an itunes fan either, but i bought stellar for 99 cents. not a bad deal.
    i was glad i was able to buy it separately. sometimes they force you to buy the entire album, because some of the tracks are not available individually.

    in reply to: I beg you, listen to I Am One Part II (acoustic)! #2738

    Speaking of which, where is Jimmy/D’Arcy for the Reel Time Sessions? They were around by then, correct?[/quote:3v6v79tz]
    if you’re talking about the acoustic session: d’arcy was there, but jimmy wasn’t. jimmy’s absence was the main reason to record some acoustic songs. the plan was to record some songs with jimmy, but he didn’t show up, so they decided to try to record some songs anyway, because they already paid for the studio.
    ([url:3v6v79tz]http://www.spfc.org/band/studio.html?session_id=6[/url:3v6v79tz])

    i find it hard to believe some of you had never heard these songs before you read this thread. my face right now: :shock:

    in reply to: Library Of Congress tapes information revealed! #2759

    Thanks Superlordspamulon! Some information from our friends at ThePumpkins.net’s board where people are discussing this matter:

    http://www.thepumpkins.net/forum/topic,1930.0/[/quote:16ai9gki]
    i don’t like that website. in my opinion, it’s one of the worst places for discussing pumpkins releases or finding related information.
    except for smiley – who is a netphoria poster in the first place, i believe – nobody even seems to understand what you’re talking about. "omg wut r u doin here we dont like you with ur website" "omg the coyle tape i never heard of that lol" :roll:

    i’m not trying to tell you what to do, of course, but i think these "info-fishing" threads would be more successful if you made them on the trading board on netphoria. there’s a lot of knowledge there.

    in reply to: Library Of Congress tapes information revealed! #2758

    hehe, davin isn’t the main webmaster of the spfc.

    in reply to: Mission To Mars #2769

    I thought this was one of the first Pumpkins t-shirts. (pre-?)Gish era.

    spfc.org backs me up on this: http://www.spfc.org/band/faq.html?faq_id=62

    I still think this is just a matter of taste. You consider I Fall the start of the Pumpkins because two members recorded a song together and later released it on a Pumpkins tape. Hope does not count, because Billy recorded it solo, and because they never played it live.

    This seems a bit arbitrary to me. A lot of Pumpkins songs were recorded by Billy Corgan alone, or were never played live. (Would you change your mind and consider the Pumpkins birthyear to be 1986 if they had played Hope live?)

    I could say I agree, or disagree, and that would be it. There isn’t much to discuss, in my opinion.

    Because I find it nothing more than a matter of taste, I don’t really care if people consider 1987 or 1988 to be the start of the Pumpkins. I think everyone says 1988 because that’s when the band was formed and when they started playing together as a 4-piece. If you want to take 1987 for all the reasons you mentioned, that is fine as well.

    I also get the feeling that Billy doesn’t feel like mentioning that the Pumpkins originally had another drummer, so he leaves that out of the band’s history on purpose. Letting the band start in 1988 with him and James and a drum machine, later adding D’arcy and Jimmy, is probably very convenient for him.
    And if you consider everything before 1988 not to be the Pumpkins, it isn’t even a lie.

    Either way, I agree with the fact that no website has correct recording info on I Fall: even spfc.org still says it was recorded in 1988. (They do mention that the early recording info is speculative, so I guess we can’t blame them.)
    Good job! Go spfreaks!

Viewing 25 posts - 3,051 through 3,075 (of 3,088 total)